What We’re Seeing: A Summary of Survey Responses

UT Advocacy partnered with the UT Alumni Association in August to administer a general election survey on higher education issues to all state legislative candidates.  Although responses are still rolling in, listed below is a broad summary of results thus far.  Interested in what your candidates said about UT & higher education?  Check back on October 1st to view full results and individual candidate responses.

The Summary: House Candidates

  • 92% of respondents favored efforts to maintain, if not increase, state funding for higher education.
  • 40% of respondents opposed efforts to cap, freeze, or place other constraints on tuition.
  • 76% of respondents favored expanding current state appropriations to the University’s non-formula units (UT Health Science Center, UT Institute for Agriculture, and the UT Institute for Public Service).
  • 59% of respondents opposed alterations to current law that would have the effect of increasing the presence of guns on campus and in the workplace.
  • 73% of respondents said they would oppose legislation that further authorized the use of HOPE scholarships at for-profit proprietary schools.

The Summary: Senate Candidates

  • 63% of respondents favored efforts to maintain, if not increase, state funding for higher education.
  • 25% of respondents opposed efforts to cap, freeze, or place other constraints on tuition.
  • 75% of respondents favored expanding current state appropriations to the University’s non-formula units (UT Health Science Center, UT Institute for Agriculture, and the UT Institute for Public Service).
  • 50% of respondents opposed alterations to current law that would have the effect of increasing the presence of guns on campus and in the workplace.
  • 63% of respondents said they would oppose legislation that further authorized the use of HOPE scholarships at for-profit proprietary schools.

House Speaker Beth Harwell, Rep. Mark White Visit UTHSC

House Speaker Beth Harwell (R-Nashville) and Representative Mark White (R-Memphis) visited the University of Tennessee Health Science Center yesterday to tour the campus, interact with students, and discuss the institution’s mission and multiple impacts on education, research, and outreach.  Also highlighted at the meeting was UTHSC’s substantial statewide economic impact.

Some findings from UTHSC’s latest economic impact study follow:

  • UTHSC’s total economic contribution to the state amounted to more than $2.3 billion.
  • UTHSC received $126.6 million of state appropriated dollars in FY2010. The $2.3 billion total impact exceeds the state appropriation by a factor of more than 18 to 1.
  • UTHSC was directly and indirectly responsible for approximately 21,096 jobs across the state.  The largest share of these jobs are in the Memphis area.
  • The 21,096 jobs created by UTHSC resulted in a total of $792.1 million of earnings, or about $38,140 per worker in FY2010.  In comparison, Tennessee per capita personal income in 2010 was just $35,307.
  • Memphis, where the main UTHSC campus is located, contributed the most in total economic impact, representing about 73.8 percent of the total $2.3 billion impact.  The other two major UTHSC locations, Knoxville and Chattanooga, represent 17.3 percent and 8.9 percent, respectively, of the total.
  • Of all physicians practicing in Tennessee, 34.3 percent were graduates of one of the four Tennessee colleges of medicine; of these, 66.7 percent were graduates of the University of Tennessee College of Medicine.  The other three medical schools in Tennessee (Vanderbilt University, Meharry Medical College, and East Tennessee State University) together account for just 11.1 percent.

The University of Tennessee is grateful to Speaker Harwell and Representative White for taking time to learn more about the University of Tennessee Health Science Center and its distinctive contributions to education, research, clinical care, and public service.

To read the full economic impact study, click here.

Higher Education and the National Party Platforms

The excitement surrounding national political party conventions has been buzzing across the nation for months.  Recently approved at these conventions are national party platforms that address policy issues in a variety of areas.  These platforms, both lengthy documents, each mention higher education and some potential policy options.  For your information, excerpts relative to higher education from each platform have been provided below.  It is important to note that a party platform is not necessarily reflective or indicative of what a particular candidate will or will not do if elected.  In other words, the party’s platform may not entirely align with the candidate’s platform.  To read the party platforms in their entirety, follow the links below.

Democratic Party National Platform
Republican Party National Platform

 Higher Education Excerpts from the Democratic Party National Platform:
“To help keep college within reach for every student,
 Democrats took on banks to reform our student loan
 program, saving more than $60 billion by removing the 
banks acting as middlemen so we can better and more directly invest in students. To make college affordable for
 students of all backgrounds and confront the loan burden
 our students shoulder, we doubled our investment in Pell
 Grant scholarships and created the American Opportunity
 Tax Credit worth up to $10,000 over four years of college,
 and we’re creating avenues for students to manage their 
federal student loans so that their payments can be only 10
 percent of what they make each month. President Obama 
has pledged to encourage colleges to keep their costs
 down by reducing federal aid for those that do not,
 investing in colleges that keep tuition affordable and
 provide good value, doubling the number of work-study 
jobs available to students, and continuing to ensure that students have access to federal loans with reasonable interest rates. We invested more than $2.5 billion in savings from reforming our student loan system to strengthen our nation’s Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Hispanic-Serving Institutions, Tribal Colleges and Universities, Alaska, Hawaiian Native Institutions, Asian American and Pacific Islander Institutions, and other Minority Serving Institutions. These schools play an important role in creating a diverse workforce, educating new teachers, and producing the next generation of STEM workers.

We Democrats also recognize the economic opportunities created by our nation’s community colleges. That is why the President has invested in community colleges and called for additional partnerships between businesses and community colleges to train two million workers with the skills they need for good jobs waiting to be filled, and to support business-labor apprenticeship programs that provide skills and opportunity to thousands of Americans. The President also proposed to double key investments in science to educate the next generation of scientists and engineers, encourage private sector innovation, and prepare at least 100,000 math and science teachers over the next decade. And to make this country a destination for global talent and ingenuity, we won’t deport deserving young people who are Americans in every way but on paper, and we will work to make it possible for foreign students earning advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics to stay and help create jobs here at home.

Mitt Romney has a radically different vision. He says we need fewer teachers, cops, and firefighters – good middle class jobs – even after losing hundreds of thousands of such jobs during the recession and at a time when state, local, and territorial governments are still shedding these jobs. He supports dramatic cuts to Head Start and the Pell Grant program.

Tuition at public colleges has soared over the last decade and students are graduating with more and more debt; but Mitt Romney thinks students should “shop around” for the “best education they can afford.” And he supports the radical House Republican budget that would cut financial aid for more than one million students while giving tax cuts to the rich. We Democrats have focused on making sure that taxpayer dollars support high-quality education programs, but Mitt Romney is a staunch supporter of expensive, for-profit schools – schools that often leave students buried in debt and without the skills for quality jobs and that prey on our servicemembers and veterans.”

Higher Education Excerpts from the Republican Party National Platform:
“Parents are responsible for the education of their children. We do not believe in a one size fits all approach to education and support providing broad education choices to parents and children at the State and local level. Maintaining American preeminence requires a world-class system of education, with high standards, in which all students can reach their potential. Today’s education reform movement calls for accountability at every stage of schooling. It affirms higher expectations for all students and rejects the crippling bigotry of low expectations. It recognizes the wisdom of State and local control of our schools, and it wisely sees consumer rights in education—choice— as the most important driving force for renewing our schools…

The Republican Party is the party of fresh and innovative ideas in education. We support options for learning, including home schooling and local innovations like single-sex classes, full-day school hours, and year-round schools. School choice—whether through charter schools, open enrollment requests, college lab schools, virtual schools, career and technical education programs, vouchers, or tax credits—is important for all children, especially for families with children trapped in failing schools. Getting those youngsters into decent learning environments and helping them to realize their full potential is the greatest civil rights challenge of our time. We support the promotion of local career and technical educational programs and entrepreneurial programs that have been supported by leaders in industry and will retrain and retool the American workforce, which is the best in the world. A young person’s ability to achieve in school must be based on his or her God-given talent and motivation, not an address, zip code, or economic status…

Higher education faces its own challenges, many of which stem from the poor preparation of students before they reach college. One consequence has been the multiplying number of remedial courses for freshmen. Even so, our universities, large and small, public or private, form the world’s greatest assemblage of learning. They drive much of the research that keeps America competitive and, by admitting large numbers of foreign students, convey our values and culture to the world.

Ideological bias is deeply entrenched within the current university system. Whatever the solution in private institutions may be, in State institutions the trustees have a responsibility to the public to ensure that their enormous investment is not abused for political indoctrination. We call on State officials to ensure that our public colleges and universities be places of learning and the exchange of ideas, not zones of intellectual intolerance favoring the Left.

College costs, however, are on an unsustainable trajectory, rising year by year far ahead of overall inflation. Nationwide, student loan debt now exceeds credit card debt, roughly $23,300 for each of the 35,000,000 debtors, taking years to pay off. Over 50 percent of recent college grads are unemployed or underemployed, working at jobs for which their expensive educations gave them no training. It is time to get back to basics and to higher education programs directly related to job opportunities.

The first step is to acknowledge the need for change when the status quo is not working. New systems of learning are needed to compete with traditional four-year colleges: expanded community colleges and technical institutions, private training schools, online universities, life-long learning, and work-based learning in the private sector. New models for acquiring advanced skills will be ever more important in the rapidly changing economy of the twenty-first century, especially in science, technology, engineering, and math. Public policy should advance the affordability, innovation, and transparency needed to address all these challenges and to make accessible to everyone the emerging alternatives, with their lower cost degrees, to traditional college attendance.

Federal student aid is on an unsustainable path, and efforts should be taken to provide families with greater transparency and the information they need to make prudent choices about a student’s future: completion rates, repayment rates, future earnings, and other factors that may affect their decisions. The federal government should not be in the business of originating student loans; however, it should serve as an insurance guarantor for the private sector as they offer loans to students. Private sector participation in student financing should be welcomed. Any regulation that drives tuition costs higher must be reevaluated to balance its worth against its negative impact on students and their parents.”